L i g h t

                                       L i g h t

                                   B e l o n g s

                                            to

                                L     I    G     H     T           

Whoever told scientists that because they though of a thing

that it belonged to them, or every question deserved an answer.

Before you, there was the light and after you, there will be light.

( Question ) If you knew what you were, would you have to search

for it .  .  . ?  ?  ?

                              –      cheyenne       –

                              2        o        1        6

Originally shared by Ed Becnel

Since the days of Galileo this undependable method of gaining knowledge through the senses has served to multiply man’s reasoning powers by teaching him HOW to do marvelous things with electricity and the elements of matter, but not one great savant of science can tell the WHY or the CAUSE of his familiar effects.

If asked what electricity, light, magnetism, matter or energy is, he frankly answers: “I do not know”.

If science actually does not know the WHY or WHAT or CAUSE of these essentials, it necessarily follows that it is, admittedly, without knowledge.

It is merely informed–but information gathered through the senses is not knowledge. The senses sense only EFFECTS. Knowledge is confined to the CAUSE of EFFECTS.

The senses are limited to but a small range of perception of the EFFECTS which they sense, and even that small range is saturated with the deceptions and distortions created by the illusion of motion.

It is impossible for the senses to penetrate any EFFECT to ascertain its CAUSE for the cause of illusion is not within effect. For this reason the entire mass of so-called empirical knowledge which science has gained by reasoning through the senses is invalid.